For more than 20 years, SKJ’s lawyers have served as Delaware counsel to the nation’s leading IP practices. As the District of Delaware venue has become even more popular for IP litigation, our lawyers are uniquely placed to work with lead counsel and clients in navigating the District. SKJ lawyers have substantial experience successfully and efficiently representing both plaintiffs and defendants in patent, trademark, and trade secret cases, in a broad range of subject matters, including pharmaceuticals (including ANDA matters), computer hardware and software technology, and telephone technology. Our patent litigation practice is limited to serving as Delaware counsel.
SKJ lawyers have served on the District of Delaware’s Local Rules Committee, as president of the Delaware Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, and have tried numerous cases before our District of Delaware judges. They have been recognized as “Superlawyers” and “Best Lawyers” in IP litigation in Delaware, by their peers and clients.
Our IP litigation attorneys strive to create a value adding relationship with our co-counsel, using our intimate knowledge of our courts and judicial practices to support and guide trial teams to an efficient and successful result.
In International Purchasing and Supply Chain Management Institute LLC v. International Procurement and Supply Chain Management Institute LLC, C.A. No. 24-1018-CFC (D. Del.), Daniel represented the plaintiff certification organization and won a default judgment and permanent injunction against a cybersquatter for violations of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, the Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Act 6 Del. C. §§ 2531 et seq., and state law.
Delaware counsel in $40 million jury verdict awarding ongoing royalty for new users of infringing products.
Delaware Counsel in multiple patent litigation matters, representing, among others, Dr. Reddy’s, Sandoz, Amneal, Hetero, Accord, Roxane, Prinston, Synthon, McKesson Automation, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Corvis Corporation, Mylan, West-Ward Pharmaceuticals and Infineon Technologies
Obtained an $11 million jury verdict and a $1.4 million jury verdict in successive patent trials in federal court in Delaware
1000 West Street
Suite 1501
Wilmington, DE 19801
© 2025 Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP | Disclaimer